Sunday, February 9, 2014

Histriographic Metafiction

                                     NOVEL Novels
My article ‘Winging Historical Writing’ came in the wake of announcement of Eleanor Catton having won the Booker last year for her historical novel ‘The Luminaries’.  Before that, we recounted the success of Hilary Mantel winning the title for same genre of writing. What is it about historical novels that the literary world is churning out so many in different parts of the world? Myriad writers are revisiting or recreating many periods of history.  Epics and Classics from antiquity are a favorite segment of the reconceptualization process. ‘Linda Hutcheon’s ‘Poetics of Postmodernism’ studies this very  current cultural phenomenon in postmodern writing  that exists; is attracting much public debate, and so deserves critical attention. She illuminates the paradoxes which come into play when a writer sets out to juxtapose his aesthetic autonomy, and self-reflexivity with the historical, social and political world.  This study is an attempt to see what happens when culture is challenged from within: challenged or questioned or contested, but not imploded.  Privileging the novel genre, and one form in particular, a form that she calls “historiographic metafiction ”. Those well-known and popular novels which are both intensely self-reflexive and yet paradoxically also lay claim to historical events and personages:’  Grass’s One Hundred Years of Solitude, Rushdie’s Shame and Midnight’s Children, Gregory’s Plantegenet series, Atwood’s Penelopiad….. 

Phillipa Gregory’s Plantegenet series is five books strong and followed by ten million readers, who are completely hooked after the enrapturing ten-episode BBC drama series on her first book ‘The White Queen.’  She has infused passionate and independent lives into women characters of the Plantegenet dynasty, marked in history by ‘War of the Roses’. A time in English history before the Tudor’s, also known as the three decade long Cousin’s War between the two houses of the Plantegenet dynasty, the House of York and the House of Lancaster. Women who just appeared as names on family trees, or footnotes to the reigns of powerful kings have been portrayed as strong women unto themselves, who pursued alliances, created rebellions, joined battles, and became Queens of England or ambitious mothers who made the impossible possible and with a killer instinct in the pursuit of power and swerving loyalties to the crown, got their sons to become kings. Powerful women
whom chroniclers of history may have projected as brood mares, or diplomatic currencies , sworn to their saintly vows of being good model wives and self sacrificing mothers. But Gregory enumerates character sketches of women personalities  made of  sterner stuff which propelled them to rule, that which could not be achieved aboveboard could then be possessed  using dastardly means, and scheming manipulations. Elizabeth Woodville a commoner who marries King Edward IV against all norms, bears him a dozen children, acquires estates, marriages and titles for her ten siblings.  Inspite of the imprisonment of her sons ‘The Princes in the Tower’, she makes sure her daughter, Elizabeth of York becomes the Queen of England. Margaret Beaufort, the mother of Henry VII, grandmother of Henry VIII (the legendery Tudor King who went against the church to legitimize his six marriages),  plotted the Buckingham Rebellion, then known as the Beaufort Rebellion, which was the first step towards the ultimate defeat of Richard III, and the crowning of her son Henry VII.

Margaret Atwood in ‘The Penelopiad’ reworks the Odyssey and gives space and voice to Penelope and the hanged handmaidens to tell their story and circumstances which tradition and history barred them from doing.  Panchali in Govinda by Udaysankar is married to the eldest Pandava brother only.  She questions her identity and role, and her quest is justice and individuation of women.  Colm Tóibín, shortlisted for the 2013 Man Booker prize, is a plaintive monologue by Mother Mary who recounts certain episodes in the life of her son, shorn  of   celestial powers that myth has empowered her with through the centuries. She pines for a comfortable home with her husband and son and wishes to be delivered of the cross that her child is ‘Son of God.’ She is a pained mother reliving the stings and arrows of atrocious misfortune that flesh is heir to. Myths are demythologized to unearth the history of mankind. Defamilairization is a tool used by writers to give us an overworked myth from the perspective of unknown and unconventional angles. Others have questioned and rebelled against established iconic legends like the question of whether the sacrifice of Sita was greater than Urmilla (Lakshman’s wife) in the epic  Ramayana.

Rushdie in ‘Midnight’s Children’, revisits the birth of a nation, a promise through magic realism. He imbues the children born at the stroke of 15August, 1947 with extra psychic powers, magical in their reach and dreams. Their ultimate humiliation, torture and unmaking is a metaphor for the dissolution of the promise of a nation, through wars, politics, societal control , racism and the Emergency. Hilary Mantel subverts the character of Thomas Cromwell to a machiavellian Chanakya. ‘Wolf Hall’ is a book which portrays the break from Rome, a process where one man is wolf to another and the divorce of Henry VIII from Catherine of Aragon. ‘Bring up the Bodies’ deals with the reign of the second queen Anne Boleyn, and at the end, her execution ordered by Henry himself. Hilary Mantel doesn’t mess with factual history but experiments with the gaps in history and that becomes her playfield as a writer.
“Historiographic metafiction has often been noticed by critics and is a major debatable topic at literary festivals in India and abroad.  It is not just metafictional, nor is it just another version of the historical novel or the non-fictional novel. Gabriel García Márquez’s One Hundred Years of Solitude is metafictionally self-reflexive and yet speaking to us powerfully about real political and historical realities: “It has thus become a kind of model for the contemporary writer, being self-conscious about its literary heritage and about the limits of mimesis...but yet managing to reconnect its readers to the world outside the page.  Modern history and modern literature [postmodern in both cases] have both rejected the ideal of representation that dominated them for so long. Both now conceive of their work as exploration, testing, creation of new meanings, rather than as disclosure or revelation of meanings already in some sense “there,” but not immediately perceptible.”

Historiographic metafiction has a liberating quality that has been seized by feminist and postcolonial writers to enable plural voices in the corridors of history to be verbalized and previewed.
Novel Novels indeed!


No comments: