http://epaper.navhindtimes.in/NewsDetail.aspx?storyid=6888&date=2016-03-06&pageid=1
Fiction to Films
One of the
activities in my book-reading sessions is comparative study of the book and the
film, if the piece of literature has been adapted into a movie. A book once read cannot be disregarded
altogether. Even if it has triggered and
evoked a strong contrarian reaction, it lingers on and is reflected upon,
analysed, criticized and then maybe adapted into a film. Watching a film
version of your favourite book is in a manner interesting – the process of
visualization of that which existed in words and was imagined in multiple ways.
What the filmmaker left out or rather
enhanced, how much did the story or visuals deviate or was followed ditto, using
the same dialogue and vocabulary, as the book.
The Oscars
2016 still fresh in our minds had nine movie nominations which were adapted or
inspired by books. Out of these, five were shortlisted as adapted screenplays viz.
Carol, The Big Short Story, The Martian, Room and Brooklyn. The others include
Steve Jobs inspired by the biography written by Walter Issacson, The Revenant
by Michael Punke and the Danish Girl with Eddie Redmayne, based on the novel by
David Ebershoff. The Embrace of the Serpent, a Columbian film shortlisted in
the Foreign Language Film category( we watched it at IFFI) was based on
handwritten diaries by two scientists –Theodore Koch Grunberg and Richard Evans
Schultes who spent 40 years working with tribals and Shamans, absorbed in their
fieldwork along the river Amazon searching for a sacred healing plant.
Carol is
based on a novel ‘The Price of Salt’ written by Patricia Highsmith in the 50s.
The writer known for her psychological thrillers had more than two dozen film
adaptations of her books. ‘Strangers on a Train’ written in 1950 enjoyed a
mediocre success in the publishing world. It was only when the undisputed master
of suspense Alfred Hitchcock adapted it into a film that it was noticed and
became a success. ‘The Talented Mr Ripley’ is another much known film based on
one of her 22 novels in the Tom Ripley series. It is interesting to note how the film showed
sly Ripley (young Matt Damon) meeting his nemesis in the end whereas the book
lets him go scot free.
The ‘Room’
written by Emma Donoghue was shortlisted for the Man Booker Prize in 2010, and
it won many other international awards, too. The story is relayed by a five
year old boy Jack (Jacob Tremblay in the film,who appeared on the Oscars night
at Dolby’s attired in a tuxedo) held captive in a
small room along with his mother. The experience is based somewhat on the
hearing in 2008 of the Fritzi Case in a small town in Austria. Brie Larson, who
played the part of the mother and the kidnapped victim, won the Oscar for the
Best Actress this year.
Jack refers to the 100 sq ft area as The Room - another
living being. Emma capitalizes significant
nouns used by the boy in the book (Rug, Bed, Wall) to emphasize his world made
up of immense possibilities contrary to the restrictiveness and claustrophobia
of the confined room and a traumatized mother. The triumph of the book is the
voice of the five year old, an engaging pervasive sound that anchors the reader
and artistically liberates the otherwise numbing story.
Colm Toibin, the Irish writer of the fame of ‘The
Testament of Mary’, talks of his marvellous experience of seeing his book come
alive on screen. He says that he has
watched the film six times and is very surprised and bemused by the transformation
of this small idea he had in a delicate space in his mind; an idea which could
have just been a novella but acquired a life of its own and went from being a
book to a solid movie. The very morphing of the visuals on screen (He denies
having played any part in the screenplay except a couple of appearances on the sets)
took him on a different journey with his own book; an interesting intriguing feel
to the whole phenomenon.
Books and
films have existed together for more than a century now and have entered into a
symbiotic relationship of ideas and forms. Creativity stems from books and
filmwallahs are inspired to make frames of the storyline of a book and project
it visually in motion pictures. It is like affirming and coalescing the
imagination when reading the book and saying, “This is how it would appear in
real life”.
Proponents
of books swear by the writings of the authors and want to be left to their
flights of imagination, rather than concretizing them to black and white
details as shown in films. Others sit glued to visual screens, as it saves them
time and effort of reading print. The sparring factions will continue on both
sides, but Colm’s take on the book – film adaptation story- brings a
fresh perspective to the entire process.
A film adaptation can be as pleasurable as reading or
writing a book. The loud iteration of an avid reader – ‘A book is always better
than its film’ or ‘Film spoils the book for its readers’ –becomes feeble and
loses force when seen in this light. Going
by Colm’s ‘bemused’ utterances, the two genres entwine and enrich each other
and can aspire to reach the same heights, making it a fabulous wholesome
experience for the reader, who can enjoy it equally or more so in two different
ways.
The jury
rests here!
No comments:
Post a Comment