Human brain still remains largely unmapped, but illuminating studies by Sigmund Freud, Jean Paul Sartre, Albert Camus and the art of Leonardo da Vinci, Van Gogh, Egon Schiele, Pablo Picasso, Salvador Dali, Francis Bacon and FN Souza is a revelation into the dark recesses of the ‘Walnut’.
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Sunday, November 24, 2013
Plumtopia Returns (PG Wodehouse)
Plumtopia Returns
Sebastian
Faulks has dared to tread the sacred turf and impersonate the art of the PLUM,
to a divided reception. Diehard fans of PG Wodehouse are outraged at Faulks
sacrilegious feat of writing a sequel to the famous Jeeves-Wooster series. The
other more tempered audience has expressed intrigue and admiration at his close
imitation of Plum’s stylistic tropes and his sheer chutzpah to imitate the
inimitable emperor of the English sentence. But I am not here to join a
bandwagon and add fuel to the fiery furore. Rather, it gives me an opportunity to
celebrate and delve into the unceasing pleasure of Wodehouse utopian world –
“Plumtopia” (courtesy: a blessed Plum fan)
Plum, as he
was lovingly called by his dear ones, believed in the lightness of being. He maintained a cheery disposition throughout
his life. He did not involve himself in the everyday care of life, leaving it
all in the able hands of his wife Ethel. Testing times of his life did not mark
him adversely. On the contrary, he continued to write comic pieces and jested
and broadcast humorous anecdotes after his internment with the Germans in the
Second World War. The ugly aftermath, which exiled him from his home
country and expatriated him to United States, was born by him with genial
happiness. Such a blessed soul could not help but paint an idyllic world in his
writings, imbued with humorous phrase, wit and the comic unsurpassed.
His critics accused him of churning out the
same story with variations over and over again. And indeed, it is intriguing that his ardent
readers awaited his next read eagerly, and haplessly absorbed his plots and
delightful recurring characters ravenously. Many a writer has been lost to the
dark recesses of forgetfulness but Wodehouse still sells along with
contemporary bestsellers. The plots of his stories are intricate with neat
twists and absurdity reigns supreme. The
Gentleman of gentlemen, the Edwardian Bertie Wooster, man of leisure but
undyingly kind and honey sweet is pursued relentlessly by lay women and
heiresses alike. He finds himself unduly
engaged, and in a mess in a country estate, not of his making, just everyday
turn of innocuous events. Cogs in the chaotic situation could be more such
incidents (of unpleasantness, inheritances or thefts) or men and women
entangled through an intricate vicious web. Jeeves, the erudite Butler, is the
only miracle man who can unwrangle the mess and set everyone free and good. Bertie
and Jeeves appeared in 1915 and were reworked by the author till their last
appearance in ‘Aunts Aren’t Gentlemen’ in 1974 when he was in his nineties. Non-Bertie
novels, the Blandings novels, The
Uncle Fred series, The Psmith novels and stories from earlier years are
indicative that his stories are somewhat
repetitive in nature – but the fanatic adherence of his followers to his
works is the magic of his language. When
we read him and assimilate him, the experience is like the man who drank his
first glass of sparkling French wine.
The word bubbles whizz and fizz in the mind creating ripples of savory
reading experience par excellence.
The characters acquired a life of their own beyond his
books. Lord Emsworth and his pig, Mr
Milliner, Jeeves…………are as alive as our real life best friends and we know them
warts and all. Their unfailing power to
woo and enthrall us is bewildering beyond reason. Wodehouse, though indicted of
creating scatterbrained female characters, evermore meddling, domineering and
stubborn, is also credited with creating women who are feisty, bubbly, witty
and with a mind of their own. And these
women were not always beautiful, young, rich or articulate to find love in
their lives. The standard prerequisites of heroines in romantic novels of his
age were subverted and they find love, companionship and joy irrespective of
looks, age and size. A true feminist agenda. “Lord Emsworth’s nephew Wilfred Allsop falls in love with his Uncle’s
‘pig-girl’ Monica Simmons, whose solid build and agricultural occupation could
hardly be less feminine. Wilfred Allsop
objects strongly when his friend Tipton ‘Tippy’ Plimsoll points this out. “I’m
sorry you think she looks like an all-in wrestler,’ he said stiffly, “To me, she seems to resemble one of those Norse
goddesses. However, be that as it may, I love her, Tippy. I fell in love with her at first sight.” A blogger writes , ‘In Wodehouse’s world, a man can have a crooked face and
a cauliflower ear, yet reign supreme. Just as it should be.’
Psmith is
the only character drawn from his own life. But he did not go on with him as an
older man because he thought that what made him funny as a young boy could not
be applied to an older version of him. Wodehouse always knew that wooly head Lord
Emsworth living in a castle was a
hilarious character he had created and he stuck with him. It isn’t every writer’s cup of tea to think of
comic sequences. It’s only if you view life lightly, are amused at life’s
twists and turns and are able to see the absurd in every person or situation ,
in short you are psyched with a funny bone , then you can dole out fiction like
PLUM, like 100 books in his lifetime. He
read exhaustively, like Shakespeare complete works throughout his life. And then, very skillfully he made a soufflé of
Cicero, Shakespeare and Spinoza and
delivered it to his readers laced with the right dose of humor.
He also
broke the standard cliché that books sell if they have hot sex in them. The
closest he came to sex in his books was a kiss on the cheek. He felt that sex could be funny, but he
refrained from it. And wow, still his
stories sell till today.
Delight in
the world of PG Plum and deliver yourself from the captivity of life!
Labels:
Book Column,
Navhind Times Book Column,
PG Wodehouse
Sunday, November 10, 2013
The Bard's Bards
The Bard’s Bards
Shakespeare lives on in our lives subtly, unconsciously and
pervasively. If we were to pay more attention to our daily English
conversational exchanges we would be astounded to note that our talk is
sprinkled copiously with phrases from the Bard’s writings.
Hot-blooded.I have not slept one wink.
Love is blind.
Make your hair stand on end.
Neither rhyme nor reason.
Too much of a good thing.
We have seen better days
Wild goose chase
A fool's paradise
A sorry sight
Brevity is the soul of wit
To be or not to be
What is in a name
Et tu Brutus
His skilled use of certain common phrases lent them an air
of extraordinariness, and he further devised many original phrases of his own,
with special effects ( like the last one). These ordinary and not-so-ordinary words grouped together as conceptual units
(phrases) have become a part of the modern English language through its
evolutionary history since the time of the Bard. When we speak in English, our
talk is intimately laced with Shakespearean quotes and phrases, being applied
everyday to new situations, circumstances, events, places and people.
Now, isn’t that exhilarating? Like being part of a greatness without a
conscious effort, as if it’s a gift to all
humanity (since English is a global language) to be used exhaustively
without even reading his extensive works. An everyday example would be –
The wild goose chase led us to places which made our hair
stand on end. We were a sorry sight by the end of it, we have seen better days,
you see.
But the interesting facet is to know the origin of a phrase
that one uses frequently. The context in
which it was used by the Bard in his
plays and verses.
The course of true love never did run smooth -This expression derives from A Midsummer Nights Dream, 1598:
LYSANDER:
Ay me! for aught that I could ever read,
Could ever hear by tale or history,
The course of true love never did run smooth;
But, either it was different in blood,--
Ay me! for aught that I could ever read,
Could ever hear by tale or history,
The course of true love never did run smooth;
But, either it was different in blood,--
Many a true word is spoken in jest -The first author to express this thought in English was probably Geoffrey Chaucer. He included it in The Cook's Tale, 1390:
But yet I pray
thee be not wroth for game; [don't be angry with my jesting]
A man may say full sooth [the truth] in game and play.
A man may say full sooth [the truth] in game and play.
Shakespeare
later came closer to our contemporary version of the expression, in King
Lear, 1605: Jesters do oft prove prophets.
Something is rotten in the State of
Denmark.
A feeling that something fishy or suspicious is going on. Hamlet: The character Marcellus states this when Hamlet is hallucinating and seeing the ghost of the recently deceased king. This phrase is especially used when describing scandals.
A feeling that something fishy or suspicious is going on. Hamlet: The character Marcellus states this when Hamlet is hallucinating and seeing the ghost of the recently deceased king. This phrase is especially used when describing scandals.
Fair play.
Miranda: "Yes, for a score of kingdoms
you should wrangle, and I would call it, fair play." The Tempest, 1610
If music be
the food of love, play on. Let us just go on dropping bard lines, ‘cause the be
all and end all of all is that the World ‘s a stage and men and women mere
players , who have their exits and entrances, or stuff that dreams are made on
, our little life without rhyme or reason , may not be just a walking shadow,
full of sound and fury , but touching heights, for what a piece of work is man
.
Sunday, October 27, 2013
Historical Fiction wins the Booker
Winging Historical Fiction !
Another historical fiction wins the Man Booker Prize
again! That too, a new writer on the bloc Eleanor Catton for her tomb of a book
‘The Luminaries’, based on the gold rush in Victorian New Zealand. Before her, the British author Hilary Mantel
bagged it twice for her historical narrative on the reign of Henry VIII.
Historical fiction, a specialized genre of writing, seems to be giving an edge
to other forms of writing, not that it has not won accolades for authors through
the times, but consecutive wins have added to its enigmatic flavor.
Historical fiction, a wonderful and satisfying blend
of storytelling and history, lends an aura of mystic to the otherwise dry,
prosaic and academic pursuit of history. Historical fiction writing is like making a
period film. The frames have to come alive with meticulous details of life in
that period of history. The author has to conjure up the times, imbuing it with
the authentic aromas of sight, smell and taste unique to that span of time. The
fashion and clothes that people wore, the language and dialects they spoke, (River
of Smoke by Amitav Ghosh), the belief systems that perpetuated the society, the
religion that communities followed, the political and social set-ups , the economy and trade of
the people….. such that when we read the book, we enter the scene in history
and breathe and feel the feel of the place and duration in time as a palpable
truth ; the then becomes now. Historical narrative in the hands of a skilled
writer acquires the scope of a Tolstoy, the depth of a Dickens and the pace of
a thriller, a fatal unputdownable reading experience par excellence. I would
any day pick up a historical narrative or watch a period film rather than pursue
a historical record to explore history. Just
waiting to lay my hands on Catton’s work!
Historical
novels, the winners make a long list. My
earlier reads would be Roots by Alex Hailey, Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy, and
Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell. Roots left an indelible impression on my
youthful mind of the long-long journey from slavery to freedom, about the
trials and tribulations of men, of mastery of humans over other men, of
subjugation, fight for freedom, search for identity, racism, oblivion of entire
cultures and rich heritage and hybridization. Anna Karenina’s search for truth
in relationships mirrors a hypocritical society mired in supercilious wealth
and hollow principles. Gone With the Wind, set against the civil war background,
glorifies the South and demonizes the North, centering on a sympathetic
depiction of slavery and the Klu Flux Klan. My recent reads have been Hilary
Mantel’s Wolf Hall and Bring up the Bodies. To be able to bag the coveted
booker prize in quick succession for the two sequels of her trilogy on Tudor
History is equally astounding and bewildering. But I would rather not delve into the
intricacies of the process of deciding a Booker winner, for the subject of
historical fiction writing intrigues me more. Wolf Hall is a book which
portrays the break from Rome, a process where one man is wolf to another and
the divorce of Henry VIII from Catherine of Aragon. Bring up the Bodies deals with the reign of
the second Queen Anne Boleyn, and at the end, her execution ordered by Henry
himself. Further researching and reading
the Tudor history, you discover why the cocktail ‘Bloody Mary’ is called such.
The latter, the daughter of the first queen ordered the beheading and slaying
of innumerable courtiers from the reign of Henry VIII, because the state
reverted back to a Catholic state and the Church became supreme again for a time. Intervening these have been other very
interesting books like The Girl With A Pearl Earring by Tracy Chevalier. A story of a domestic help who, because of her
intelligent disposition and sensitivity, becomes a confidante of the famous
painter, Vermeer. The ensuing relationship paints a portrait of Vermeer’s work,
personality, household and 17th century Delfit town. ‘Beloved’ by
Toni Morrison haunted me just as she haunts the home of her mother who mercy-killed
her to save her from a life of slavery. One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel
Garcia Marquez is the delineation of a fictional town Macondo and the story of a
noble, ridiculous, beautiful family, a reflection of all of humanity, just as
in the history, myths, growth and decay of Macondo, one sees all of Latin
America.
Back
home, I have thoroughly enjoyed revisiting history through the works of Amitav
Ghosh. He said of his work, ‘The Glass
Palace, “one can examine the truths of individuals in history definitely more
completely in fiction than one can in history”. The release of the first
two books of the Ibis trilogy engrossed me further. The books outdo theory as
well as history in terms of its subtle treatment of colonialism. Amitav’s broad canvas in the books is big
enough to include insights into 20th century Burma after the 3rd
Anglo Burmese War in 1885 and the Opium Wars between China and Britain – a
classic portrayal of British hegemony and despotism. Before these, Salman Rushdie’s Midnight Children
and Enchantress of Florence held me captive with their stylistic writing
technique of magic realism used superbly to portray the birth of a nation and
in the latter, the Mughal Courts and the Medici family of Florence. The
Twentieth Wife by Indu Sundaresan
transports the reader to the court of Prince Salim and his involvement
with Mehrunissa, the wife of an Afghan commander, who with the turn of history
becomes the empress of the Mughal empire – Nur Jahan.
History
is the story of mankind on earth. Classics,
from Homers’ Odyssey, Kalidasa’s
Shakuntala, Shakespeare’s Othello, ‘The Qissa of Heer Ranjha’ by Waris
Shah to contemporary literature, portray
the tales of man which are ever repetitive. These great classics live on and can never die,
for human nature and behavioural patterns recur again and again. Historical
fiction intrigues, baffles, astounds, disgusts and imbues us with more such
emotions – and the question remains , ‘Do we really learn from history?’ Primary
aim of life is to live it forwards, but we can learn only when we look
backwards. ‘Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it’, seems
to hold more true for mankind.
Sunday, October 13, 2013
Gandhi before India
Gandhi the Man: How One Man Changed Himself to Change the World
Yet another book is out on Gandhi, ‘Gandhi
before India’ written by our popular historian Ramachandra Guha. A book with a
difference, as it seeks to explore the context of Gandhi’s words and actions in
the context of the words and opinion of his associates, friends and
acquaintances. ‘The Collected Works’, the hundred-volume mammoth writings of
Gandhi comprising of letters, speeches, interviews, essays, has been an
authentic source and a mainstay of writers and critics, who have wanted to
reflect, write or film him. The volumes are indicative of his prolific writings
throughout his life. It is available today as a CDROM, but Ramachandra deviates
from the norm and has based his research on the archives in India, London and
Africa, in government papers, documented
court cases, letters to Gandhi from friends and adversaries. He distills a
space for the reader to view Gandhi from a perspective, other than his own
voice. Secondly, his emphasis is on the making of the Mahatma, given the set of
circumstances, influences and experiments that he encountered in Victorian
London and colonial Africa, which shaped his philosophy of non-violence, and
school of thought about racism, imperialism, civil rights movement, woman
emancipation and a deliverance from social evils.
Guha’s preoccupation in the book is study
of the colossal metamorphosis in the persona of Gandhi which happened overseas,
and turned an
average man into a Mahatma. A man born in an orthodox Gujarati Bania family,
was drawn by the prestige of law college in London, where he practiced
vegetarianism, and returned a barrister. If the barrister had made it big in
his profession in India, he would have continued as a wealthy Gujju bania,
confined to his conservative community, beset with prejudices, but the failure
sent him to Africa where his experiences propelled him to first defend Muslims
and then discover a diasporic Indian community of Bengalis, Tamilians,
Punjabis…… of hawkers, tradesmen, street urchins, professionals, lawyers,
representing India’s cultural,
linguistic and religious diversities. Guha says,’Gandhi’s skills as a writer, propagandist, organiser
and fund-collector were also shaped and developed there. He wanted to pay
close attention to these decades and the interesting cast of characters he
worked with — his housemates Henry and Millie Pollak; the Tamil radical Thambi
Naidoo who with his fellow Tamils saved the Satyagraha movement; his secretary
Sonja Schlesin who pushed him to take a more sympathetic stance on gender
rights; his friend Pranjivan Mehta who funded and supported him and who played
a fundamental role in shaping Gandhi. In South Africa, Gandhi had real friends,
colleagues, companions; in India, he had mostly followers, disciples or rivals.
He also wanted to flesh out his life in Gujarat and London in more detail. It
was while he was writing for the Vegetarian Society in London that he learnt
how to craft an argument, how to make a case, to collaborate with other people
in an organization and how to build relationships — all very important to his
later work in his homeland.’ Guha has balanced his approach by also delineating
his patriarchal approach to his married life and his abominable failure with
his elder son.
The book, a voluminous edition and
outcome of eight years of research parlayed from his series of lectures on
‘Arguments with Gandhi’ at the University of California in Berkeley. The
authorities were a little skeptical about the enrollment for the course, but
the full-class attendance got Guha thinking of the great worldwide impact
Gandhi had on minds transcending time, geography, and national boundaries. His
epigraphic quote of Gandhi from his book ‘My Experiments with Truth’ admits
to inadequacy of autobiography as
history which is an individual’s subjective truth – but our wide diverse
reading as avid readers leads us to discern our own truth about man and
history. In this endeavor, Guha’s book is an appreciated attempt.
The book unintentionally draws the attention of the
people away from two recent writings:
A
famous historian Jad Adams who wrote many revealing facts on Mahatma Gandhi in
his book, ‘Gandhi: Naked Ambition’. The book no doubt caused a lot of swirl in
the public and media, but at the same time it also invoked many questions in
people’s minds about the truth of Gandhi. Joseph Lelyveld’s ‘Great Soul’ explored the
homoerotic relationship of Gandhi with his Jewish friend, Hermann Kallenbach.
‘Touchzing Media, an iOS app development company,
announced the release and immediate
availability of Mahatma Gandhi Interactive Biography 1.0, its latest book title
developed exclusively for Apple's revolutionary iPad device. Designed
specifically for the iPad screen, this app features a complete interactive
biography of Gandhi with rare photographs, videos and articles covering all the
major events and people of his life. Gandhi was famous as a man of peace and
this app presents his life story in an interactive format. This app aims to
inspire today's generation with Gandhi's message of peace, just like he
inspired millions of people, years back.’
Gandhi lives on in the contemporary world of power
structures, rivalries and hatred. A flame that burns over a dark void, but its
very existence and prevalence sustains hope and light in our hearts. And the
cycle of life goes on!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)